All About Senior Care Insurance Services Inc in Merrillville, IN

41:7 -42:8. This is inadmissible hearsay. See, e. g., Wilson v. Lear Seating Corp., 258 F. Supp. 3d 916, 919 (N.D. Ind. 2017) ("The only evidence that [the complainant] cites to support this assertion is testament from her own deposition. Because she offers [another]'s statements 'to show the fact of the matter asserted,' the declarations are hearsay.") (pricing  A Good Read  Fed.

Senior Care Life Insurance Plan - Senior Care Life Insurance

Evid. 801(c)); Rogers v. Waukegan Club. Sch. Dist. 60, 924 F. Supp. 2d 940, 946 (N.D. Ill. 2013) ("The just record evidence that [the plaintiff] mentions to support this assertion is testament from [his] own deposition. This testament is hearsay under Federal Guideline of Evidence 801(c) because [the complainant] testified to the statement of an out-of-court declarant.

in an effort to establish the fact of the matter asserted by the declarant."). In her response to the Motion to Strike, Plaintiff argues normally that other statement supports her declarations, but does not resolve the basis of Complainant's supposed knowledge about her male co-workers' wages, commission schedules, or task tasks, and does not point to any particular portion of the deposition testament that bolsters her assertions.

City of Chicago, 863 F. 3d 645, 650 (7th Cir. 2017) ("The judge appropriately decreased to learn the voluminous record to discover proof on a counseled plaintiff's behalf."). Since the only proof Complainant cites in assistance of her contentions relating to the male insurance representatives' job responsibilities, wages, and made commissions are her own unsupported statements, they need to be stricken.

HomeOwnersInsuranceFortLauderdale Enjoy every moment and never worry - Long  term care insurance, Senior care services, Long term care

Senior Care Insurance Services of Zanesville - Facebook

Indicators on Senior Healthcare Insurance Services, LLC Home Page You Need To Know

Walker, 583 F. 3d 979, 985 (7th Cir. 2009) (citing cases). Defendant argues that a variety of Complainant's other statements are contradicted by her own testimony. For example, Complainant states that she was not repaid for travel expenditures, which Offender argues is irregular with her deposition statement that she received a gas card.

Plaintiff likewise consists of legal conclusions in her recitation of facts. Statements for which Complainant has actually not provided any evidentiary support can not be utilized to counter a movement for summary judgment. Abuelyaman v. Ill. State Univ., 667 F. 3d 800, 812 (7th Cir. 2011) ("It is well settled that conclusory accusations and self-serving affidavits, without assistance in the record, do not create a triable concern of fact.") (estimating Hall v.